 |
graham
 New User
Join Date: 11/6/2005 Posts: 14 Location: NRW |
 |
|
Both movies are quite old, one in 2001 and the other in 2003. Result: quality/size/length not to good and content hmmm somewhat about average i think?
But he has been a good player once and those days it was a nice movie ;) |
| IP: Logged |
Posted: 12.3.05 @ 1:30 PM |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
[PT] TANIA
 Site Admin
Join Date: 12/11/2003 Posts: 4,500 Location: FOREVER3 |
 |
|
 |
 |
dr_burschelmann
 Regular User
Join Date: 11/16/2004 Posts: 171 Location: Germany, Berlin |
 |
|
 |
 |
stevij
 Regular User
Join Date: 10/9/2004 Posts: 679 Location: us |
 |
|
dlji
 for the lulz |
| IP: Logged |
Posted: 12.3.05 @ 2:43 PM |
 |
 |
dr_burschelmann
 Regular User
Join Date: 11/16/2004 Posts: 171 Location: Germany, Berlin |
 |
|
@ down in the air: - frags were not bad, but not awesome - music like nightwish is not good for using it in an q3-movie^^ - nice quality, but itz looks like there were failures by recording the demos. in the end it looks like fraps or something xD.
overall: 5/10
now dling the second one ;)


Download OneShot here!! Enlarge your Penis here!! |
| IP: Logged |
Posted: 12.3.05 @ 2:56 PM |
 |
 |
stevij
 Regular User
Join Date: 10/9/2004 Posts: 679 Location: us |
 |
|
bad fps, cfg, first few frags wernt even kills. what you would expect from a 5 year old movie
 for the lulz |
| IP: Logged |
Posted: 12.3.05 @ 3:00 PM |
 |
 |
stevij
 Regular User
Join Date: 10/9/2004 Posts: 679 Location: us |
 |
|
2nd one is worse :X
 for the lulz |
| IP: Logged |
Posted: 12.3.05 @ 3:07 PM |
 |
 |
r@mp@g3
 Regular User
Join Date: 6/23/2005 Posts: 381 Location: USA |
 |
|
Yeah, what i really didn't like was how slow it was...jesus.

|
| IP: Logged |
Posted: 12.3.05 @ 4:59 PM |
 |
 |
xSa1nTx
 New User
Join Date: 11/13/2005 Posts: 5 Location: CaNaDa OnT |
 |
|
| r@mp@g3 wrote: | | Yeah, what i really didn't like was how slow it was...jesus. |
i agree with that, watched 6 frags then deleted it :) |
| IP: Logged |
Posted: 12.4.05 @ 2:31 PM |
 |
 |
do_Ob
 guest |
 |
|
| those are made 5 years earlier... could you do better? |
| IP: Logged |
Posted: 12.4.05 @ 3:50 PM |
 |
 |
:(
 guest |
 |
|
| lol they suck . Isn't there some wau own=age.com can moderate some of the m,ovies that gets posted, as they are clearly as waste of time. |
| IP: Logged |
Posted: 12.6.05 @ 6:45 AM |
 |
 |
graham
 New User
Join Date: 11/6/2005 Posts: 14 Location: NRW |
 |
|
thats why I told you they are old, so quality (fps and stuff like that is what might be included when i say quality) is bad and conten about average (of nowadays users, not average of the movies you watch all the day).
On the other hand i somehow dont understand what u mean :/
my player sais its 29.xx (~30) fps and it runs fluent here... like every movie with more than 25 o_O
and what about the cfg? thats what i got comments on with my alpha bbu movie... draw2d 0 is cool, it runs fullscreen and fluent. so what you mean :(
maybe bad engines like mine (1000mhz, 64mb ram, voodoo3) can play old movies better *lol* |
| IP: Logged |
Posted: 12.6.05 @ 1:24 PM |
 |
 |